Heart1.com: Great Information, Real Community, Better Living.
 Register
 Login
 Main Page
 Heart News
Feature Story
 Education Center
Conditions
Procedures
Diagnostics
 Heart Attack Center
Prevention
Survivors
Dr. Tod Engelhardt  Heart
 Hero™

Dr. Tod Engelhardt:
Combating Major Blood Clots.
About Heroes
 Join the Discussion  in  Our Forums
 Community
Heart1 Forums
Patient Stories
 Reference
Online Resources
Video Library
advertisement
Search the Body1 Network
May 16, 2021  
HEART NEWS: Feature Story

  • Print this Article
  • Email this Article
  • Links/Reprints
  • Heart patient in hospital bed

    MRI Test Could Replace Angiograms


    December 28, 2001
    A new type of imaging technique using an MRI device can detect most diseased coronary arteries, and so could spare many heart patients a more invasive, expensive and uncomfortable test, researchers say.

    MRI, or magnetic resonance imaging, has been used for the past 10 years to study very large blood vessels such as the aorta. Patients must lie inside the MRI machine, a giant electromagnet that yields 3-D images of the body.

    Now doctors at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston have adapted the technology to produce a series of high-resolution images of the relatively small coronary arteries.

    Two smaller studies found the system could spot arteries blocked or narrowed by plaque in patients already diagnosed with coronary artery disease by the current ``gold standard' test — the X-ray-based angiogram.

    A new study — the first to try the system at several hospitals and on previously untested patients — found it detected every diseased coronary artery in 75 percent of the patients and found the most life-threatening blockages in 89 percent.

    The MRI technique is still not as thorough as an angiogram, but it is less invasive.

    ``This technique is a significant advance,' said Dr. Valentin Fuster, director of the Cardiovascular Institute at New York's Mount Sinai Medical Center and past president of the American Heart Association. ``In five years, I think it's going to overtake the conventional angiogram.'

    By then, Fuster expects advances will bring sharper images, allowing doctors to spot even tiny lesions that could eventually lead to heart attacks.

    In an angiogram, a catheter is threaded from a groin or arm artery up to the heart. The catheter then injects a dye that can be seen on a ``movie' X-ray, helping doctors spot blockages.

    Angiograms produce very clear pictures but cause complications in about 1 percent of the 1.2 million patients getting the test each year, including a slight chance of artery damage or a heart attack. So researchers have been seeking a way to get similar results without the risks or other drawbacks.

    The research on the MRI technique was reported in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine. It was led by Dr. Warren J. Manning, head of noninvasive cardiac imaging at Beth Israel Deaconess.

    The study involved 109 patients at Beth Israel and six other U.S. and European sites where staff had little experience with the new MRI system. Each patient first had the MRI test, followed by an angiogram.

    The researchers got clear images of only 84 percent of the artery segments with the MRI test, compared with 100 percent for the angiograms, noted Dr. Rohit Arora, chief of cardiology and cardiac catheterization at University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey in Newark.

    ``Blockages are still being missed' by the MRI, he said.

    The four main coronary arteries, with an inside diameter of only one-eighth of an inch, wrap around the outside of the heart and supply the muscle with blood. The arteries' small size and constant motion make it hard to capture images of them.

    Overall, about 40 percent of patients who get an angiogram — because a cardiac stress test indicated they might have coronary artery disease — turn out not to have such disease, meaning they did not need the $5,000 test.

    In those patients, doing just the MRI test would be sufficient and would cost only about $1,000, Manning said.

    Still, the MRI test has drawbacks, such as requiring patients to lie inside the device for an hour, about three times longer than an angiogram takes.


    Related Web Resources
    American Heart Association
    New England Journal of Medicine
    Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Last updated: 28-Dec-01

    Comments

  • Add Comment
  •    
    Interact on Heart1

    Discuss this topic with others.
     
    Feature Archives

    Heart Disease Patients Need to Exercise to Benefit from the Protective Effects of Wine

    Effective Treatment for Heart Failure Possible Following Discovery of Heart Molecule

    Significant Decrease in Heart Disease after Prison Smoking Bans

    Heart Failure Patients Who Sleep Poorly Are at Double the Risk for Hospitalization

    Long-Term Survival Possible for Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients

    Next 5 Features ...

    More Features ...
       
     
    Related Multimedia

    Knee Surgery - The Necessity; After the Procedure

    Interview with James Spies, M.D. about Treatments for Fibroids

    The Concurrence of Pacemakers and MRI Scans - Interview with Dr. Coman

    More Features ...
     
    Related Content
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    MRI Recommended for Evaluating Uterine Fibroids

    MRI – Diagnostic Tool for Uterine Fibroids

    More Features ...
     
    Home About Us Press Jobs Advertise With Us Contact Us
    advertisement
    © 2021 Body1 All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer: The information provided within this website is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for consultation with your physician or healthcare provider. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Owners and Sponsors of this site. By using this site you agree to indemnify, and hold the Owners and Sponsors harmless, from any disputes arising from content posted here-in.